Vipers Away

So I see that there is a writer’s strike under way.  Normally I couldn’t be arsed to care much about it.  However, if it affects the fourth season of Battlestar Galactica, I’m going to have to go down there and get medieval on somebody with a rubber hose.

Election Thoughts

I just came back from voting, and had a few thoughts about the issues and process.

First, I got over there about 8:15 and while there were several cars in the lot at the Lion’s Club, it turned out they were all election judges.  I don’t know if I was the first voter of the day, but I was the only one at that time.  While I was there only one other person showed up, and it turned out he was at the wrong location. 

This year Tarrant County replaced the complete-the-line optical scan ballots with a new fill-in-the-box optical scan system and they also offered the Hart InterCivic (the one I call “The Etch-a-Sketch”) for anyone who wanted to use it.  Despite (or perhaps because of) working in IT, I want nothing to do with computer-based voting systems.  I prefer paper ballots, and I find that the optical scan system provides a good middle-ground between automation and creating a paper-based physical record.  My only gripe about the new system is that filling in the box (at least with the pen they provided) seems to take forever.

I noticed two R-n Pa-l (one dare not speak his name online, lest his groupies be summoned forth like lesser demons from the pits of hell) signs out in front of the Lion’s Club.  I was a bit perplexed by this, since there was nothing concerning him on the ballot.  But I suppose it was a chance to try to advance awareness of his existence.  [ Note: Should my obfuscation above fail to work, I want to make it known right now that any and all comments regarding the afore-unmentioned candidate will be summarily deleted.  My blog.  My rules. ]

Of the constitutional amendments, I voted against the $3-billion cancer research item.  Not that I don’t worry about cancer, nor is it not a worthy cause.  I just don’t see it as the business of the State of Texas to be funding this sort of research. 

Really, the only puzzler for me on the ballot was the library bond issue.  I’ve flip-flopped back and forth several times over the past month or so, but I finally decided to vote for the bond.  It will probably raise our taxes a bit (once we get to the point of considering the big infrastructure issues), but I think it’s time to get started on doing something with the library.  I’m still concerned that the whole thing was rushed and a bit too sparse on specifics, but I think that can be managed by watching the final proposal closely and making my thoughts known to the council.

For reference, my thoughts on the whole sordid library affair can be found in the Keller Library category.

Finally, I’m a bit annoyed at the City of Keller’s misuse of my email address(es).  I signed up for the Police Department’s E-SAFE mail program several years ago.  When the city created its own “enews” service, I signed up for it using a different address.  I also specified that I wanted email in TEXT format (I’m not a big fan of HTML emails).  Lately, someone at city hall has decided to appropriate Scott Bradburn’s E-SAFE list and subscribe everyone on it to the city’s newsletter.  It’s quite obvious and annoying, since I now get TWO copies of every city emailing, one in Text and another in HTML.  I should also note that their Text version looks like ASS.  It’s obvious that they aren’t paying any attention to their Text-based users.  This is related to the election in that they sent out a missive at about 6:45 this morning reminding us about the ballot issues.

For those who might be interested, if you’re on the city’s enews service and you get HTML-based emails, you are being tracked.  The city is using Constant Contact, and the email contains web-bugs (tracking images) as well as tracked links.  If your email client automatically loads images in HTML-based emails, Constant Contact will know that your email address is active, that you opened the email, when you opened the email, as well as logging your IP address.  If you click any of the links in the email (such as to get more information about the bond proposal), they will know that you did so.  There’s nothing really nefarious going on here, but I just thought I’d point it out because most people do not know it’s happening. 

The Malcolm Report

Alternate title: The Dog Slobber Report

Malcolm seems to be adjusting to life here, although there have been a few rough spots along the way. 

He’s now officially banned from the bed because of an unfortunate pee incident.  But he learned fairly quickly not to chew the couch cushions.  He chewed them twice while I was out.  After the second incident I gave him a good scolding and he hasn’t messed with them again.  On the bright side is that he chose the back edge to chew on, and he didn’t chew too much of it, so it remains hidden however I flip the cushion. 

Tomorrow marks the two week anniversary of his neuter operation, and he’ll be going back to have the sutures removed.  Amazingly, he didn’t act like anything had happened once he was back home.  The vet gave instructions that he was supposed to be on “limited activity” for the first 7 days, but I couldn’t quite figure out how to limit it other than to lock him into a room or something.  He was running and jumping right away and immediately started playing with Boots.  They’ve spent hours and hours playing (and slobbering on one another and me) since then and the only incident that I noticed was when Boots rammed her head into his underbelly.  He jumped several feet into the air and yelped when that happened. 

I noticed that he doesn’t like to climb up into the truck, which is odd because his long legs should make it fairly easy (this was before the surgery).  He’s also quite reluctant to come down (he slowly slides his head over the edge and then kind of slides off the seat onto the ground).  While Boots has no problems getting in and out, when I factored in Malcolm’s issues and thought about the strain on her forelegs when she jumps down, I decided to get a ramp.  I found a really nice telescoping ramp with an aluminum frame that should have been suitable for both of them.  Unfortunately, the first time I extended it the aluminum made a screeching sound that traumatized the both of them.  I tried introducing them to it slowly (i.e. leaving it on the floor and letting them sniff it and get acclimated to it), but nothing I could do would convince them to get on it.  I finally managed to get Boots on it a couple of times by setting it up on a chair in the living room and putting a treat at the top.  It was set up such that the only way either of them could reach the treat was by walking up the ramp.  But Malcolm is still a no-go, so I’m guessing the ramp is going to be a waste of money.  That, or I’ll just have to spend more time letting him get used to it.  If they won’t use a ramp, then maybe I’ll have to look at getting a shorter vehicle in the future (that said, I happened to notice the ‘08 Honda Elements look better than the first ones, which I had originally dismissed; perhaps it’s time for another look).

The two of them are prodigious poop machines.  I’m now trying to figure out what to do about the backyard, which is now something of a minefield.  I’m looking into some sort of “digester” (a doggie septic tank).  Either I’ll just get a commercial model (like the Doggie Dooley) or perhaps build something on my own (some instructions/examples here).  Over the weekend I started to dig the hole, but after pecking at the rock-hard ground a couple of times with a shovel I gave up and went back inside (my get-up-and-go had got-up-and-went). 

By the way, this dog business is fairly expensive:

* Initial exam, heartworm meds, flea treatement, city tag $150
* Grooming (mat removal, bathing, cutting) $50
* Neuter and microchip $300
* Unused ramp $100

Total so far:  $600 and counting

Edit: As noted in the comments, I have a mental block when writing/typing the name Malcolm.  I’ve edited the entry to fix the misspellings.

I Can Has Break?

Things have been a bit busy these past couple of weeks, hence my observance of radio silence.  In addition to spending Tuesday nights (6:30-9:30) either teaching or assisting the teaching of the new CERT class, I’ve been taking First Responder training on Mondays and Wednesdays (6:00-10:00).  And we had a regular monthly CERT meeting last Thursday, so I managed to spend four of five week nights at the Fire-Admin building.  My days have generally followed the pattern of:  Work, Class, Home (clean up what the dogs have destroyed), Sleep, drag-ass out of bed back to Work, lather, rinse, repeat. 

I can now see the light at the end of the tunnel, though, since the last class will be this Saturday (unfortunately it’s all day on Saturday, starting at 8:00 am, but at least it’s the last one).

Initial Impression: Amazon.com’s MP3 Download Store

I’ve been wanting to buy high-quality non-DRM’ed digital music in MP3 (or some other fairly open format) for quite a long time.  Searching my archives I see that I first brought this up four years ago.  And after using iTunes music store for a while, I finally got tired of the DRM about three years ago.  Recently, Apple announced DRM-free music, for a slightly higher price, although it was of slightly higher quality.  I played with it a little bit, but didn’t do too much with it, as it was still in Apple’s format (although being DRM-free it would at least play on my Squeezeboxes ) .

So upon learning that Amazon.com was offering DRM-free MP3 downloads in 256kbps VBR I decided I had to check it out.  First, installing their download app was pretty painless (although I have not used it to buy a full album yet).  The prices seem reasonable ($0.89/track in most cases).  And the selection is far better than any of the other DRM-free services I’ve investigated in the past. 

In fact, I fear that this could become quite a dangerous feature of Amazon.com.  It’s easy to lose track of what you’re spending when it’s only $0.89 a track.  I’ve already picked up one track that I couldn’t previously find without either buying the whole CD (or buying a DRM-encumbered version in iTunes).  That’s exactly the scenario that I think this setup is perfect for.  I would not have bought the whole CD for the one song, so ultimately the label and artist get some small amount of revenue that they would not previously have gotten, and I get a copy of the song to keep.  Classic win-win.

The best find so far?  Carl Douglas – Kung Fu Fighting (disco flutes and all).  No, I didn’t buy it, though.  I was just amused to find it ranked as the 16th most popular MP3 download in the “Dance & DJ” category.

Men Need Not Apply

I saw this WSJ article last month when it was referenced by Dr. Helen.  It came to my mind again because of something that happened as I was leaving the vet’s office yesterday afternoon.

When children get lost in a mall, they’re supposed to find a “low-risk adult” to help them. Guidelines issued by police departments and child-safety groups often encourage them to look for “a pregnant woman,” “a mother pushing a stroller” or “a grandmother.”

The implied message: Men, even dads pushing strollers, are “high-risk.”

Are we teaching children that men are out to hurt them? The answer, on many fronts, is yes. Child advocate John Walsh advises parents to never hire a male babysitter. Airlines are placing unaccompanied minors with female passengers rather than male passengers. Soccer leagues are telling male coaches not to touch players.

A woman had parked her Tahoe next to my Avalanche and was in the process of unloading her kids when I exited the office with Malcom.  He was a bit stressed,  so I took him into the grass next to the office for a minute to let him sniff around and get calmed down.  The lady got the first child into a stroller and pushed it up over the curb onto the sidewalk and went back to get the second child.  The sidewalk has a slight incline and I noticed the stroller start rolling backwards towards the curb and I was certain it would tip over if it got that far.  I ran towards it and yelled at the woman about the stroller.  But as I went I couldn’t help but think about the fact that I was an adult male running towards a stroller with a child in it.  Fortunately, the woman saw what was happening and got to it before I did, and she didn’t react badly. 

Am I overreacting?  I don’t think so, considering that just the accusation of some sort of inappropriate conduct with a child is enough to completely ruin a man’s life these days.  And I hate that it’s come to this.  Men are afraid to interact with children who aren’t related (and sometimes even if they are), and children are growing up sensing that men are uncomfortable around them, which probably damages them in some way or another.

I don’t know how we get out of this hole we’ve dug for ourselves, though.  Just that we need to do something different.

Dervishes, Two, Type: Whirling

I had one of those “what the hell have I done” moments last night as both dogs were orbiting my feet like furry demented satellites.  While they aren’t terribly rough with each other, they tend to be quite energetic, going over, under, and through anything in their way, including me.  I’ve got the bruises to prove it.

New Addition

I’d been contemplating getting another dog so that Boots would have a canine companion.  I wasn’t in any particular hurry, figuring the right dog would probably present itself at the right time (kind of how Boots showed up when she did). 

The Friday before last I took Boots with me in the truck when I went to drop off some shirts at the dry cleaners.  The lady inside noticed Boots in the truck and asked me if I liked dogs.  I said that I did and she asked if I wanted another one.  It turns out that she bought the dog for her 19-year-old daughter, who will be going away to school and isn’t really taking care of it very well.  Further, it’s a Collie and she doesn’t like having dog hair in the house (with a Collie, you’re approaching 100% certain that there will be dog hairs floating around in the house). 

I told her that I would consider it and that I’d call her on the Saturday after I got back in town.  So yesterday I called and made arrangements to go see the dog and to let Boots meet him.  They got along well enough, although I got the impression that might be a little too rambunctious for Boots’ taste.

This is Malcom:

He’s an unaltered 10-month old Collie (soon to be altered, but don’t tell him that…).  He’s obviously still very much a puppy inside a grown-up dog body.  He’s actually kind of funny, since he acts like he hasn’t quite figured out how his legs work.  Now that Boots has been around him a little longer, she seems to have mostly accepted him.  There was a lot of playful barking, running, and nipping last night and this morning.  The only downside is that they decided to bring their play session onto the bed this morning, where I was attempting to sleep.  It’s rather difficult to remain sleeping when two 60-lb dogs are dancing on top of you (I’m just waiting for the bruises to show).  The only issue I see is that Boots is a little jealous, and tries to get up against me and prevent him from doing so.  But it’s nothing major (i.e. it’s fairly playful and there is no growling or snarling).

So far he hasn’t chewed on anything or had any accidents, which is good.  But he’s got tons of puppy energy, which may prove challenging. 

On Monday I’m going to contact the vet’s office to have him groomed (he has some horrible mats that I’m not even going to attempt to get out, lest I hurt him), examined, chipped, and snipped. 

Travel Quickies

I’m currently writing from an undisclosed location in Minnesota, where I have meetings all week.  I flew through Chicago on American today, and thought I’d share a couple of observations/thoughts:

* Upon landing in Chicago the first order of business was finding the men’s room.  While there I couldn’t help but notice that the stall walls only have about a 2-inch gap at the bottom.  I like the idea, because it definitely feels more private.  It also keeps anyone from reaching under and stealing your stuff.  Finally, it doesn’t leave much room for toe-tapping shenanigans.

* As we were taxiing out from the gate at Chicago, I observed at least five American MD-80’s from behind.  What caught my eye was the fact that on each and every one the right engine nacelle was dirtier/sootier than the left one.  Is there something in the American pilot’s manual for the S80 that favors the right thrust reverser?

* Someone unleashed a stinkbomb from the depths of hell shortly after the takeoff roll on that little American Eagle jet.  Whoever your are, please note that the rest of us really, really weren’t interested in sharing.  Is it really too much to ask to lay off on the gassy stuff before flying?  The rest of us would definitely appreciate it.

Trust Issues and Space for Dogs

I’ve been idly contemplating ditching my Avalanche for something different.  The first thing that put this thought into my mind was last year’s blown transmission.  Since then it’s developed two annoying, but not fatal, problems.  First, at seemingly random intervals, the climate control system decides that the driver’s side needs full heat, despite being set in A/C mode.  Stopping and restarting the engine resets it, though.  Second, also at random intervals, it decides that it doesn’t want to unlock the rear doors.  What makes these problems especially frustrating, though, is that there is no way to force them to happen, so I haven’t bothered to take it into the dealer yet.  If it can’t be recreated, the dealer will just likely say to come back when it happens again. 

The other major factor in my mind is that the Avalanche is not optimal for carrying a dog.  Boots gets in and out well enough, but she’s still young enough to jump into the back seat (although I worry about the strain on her front legs from jumping down).  But she doesn’t fit in the seat very well.  She’s big enough that she can’t lay down without stretching out across the seat (which means that if there’s anyone in the back with her she generally ends up laying across their lap).  I’m thinking that some sort of regular SUV would be better than the Avalanche for her.  I could fold down one of the seats to give her access to the cargo area and put down some sort of bed there.  This should also keep all the dirt and fur out of the seats (right now I keep a cover on the back seats in the Avalanche).

When I bought this Avalanche I was intending it to be something that would last for a long time, hence the upgrades from the previous Avalanche (i.e. from cloth to leather, added a sunroof, premium sound, etc).  I was driving fewer miles and thought that would let me keep it well beyond when it was paid off.  Also in favor of getting the current one was the fact that the previous Avalanche had more than double the miles of this one and had ZERO mechanical issues.  All of this gives me a lingering doubt as to whether this Avalanche is a good idea in the long run.  I’m starting to think it’s better to dump it before the extended warranty runs out.  I’d hate to find myself having to get another transmission at that point (a $2K to $3K repair).

I did some checking online and found that mine is worth between $3K and $6K more than its payoff value (depending on how you evaluate it in the calculator; I factored in the mechanical issues into the lower estimate, thereby letting the dealer handle it for me, rather than having to deal with it before trade in; regardless of the small mechanical issues, the low mileage really helps).  With that amount of residual, I could use the trade as my down payment and not have to spend any money out-of-pocket.

So, that leads me to have to make some choices.  The first, and most important, is whether I give GM another chance or whether I go to Toyota (which seems to have the best reputation for reliability).  GM has some good deals on the 2007 Tahoe right now, and 0% on 2006 models.  Feature-for-feature, the Tahoe could be configured to most closely match what I have now on the Avalanche.  And combining the trade-in value with the specials I would end up paying less (overall and in monthly payments).  However, *ALL* of Chevroloet’s SUV’s and trucks use the same transmission as the Avalanche and also share the majority of the other systems (such as door locks and A/C).  That’s a big demerit against GM for me right now.

On the other side, Toyota has the best reliability ratings, but they don’t offer anything exactly comparable.  But for what I need, perhaps something like the 4Runner would fit the bill.  From a pure style perspective, I like the FJ Cruiser, although it might be a bit small.  Both the 4Runner and FJ Cruiser are listed as either the top or second most reliable mid-sized or small SUV’s (the 4Runner came in second to the Toyota Highlander Hybrid for 2007; interestingly, the Tahoe was fourth behind three Toyota models in the large SUV segment).  I suppose a test drive will be in order to see how well I fit into these SUVs as well as to see how they actually handle.

I’m not in a huge hurry, and I probably won’t even bother going to look at anything until late this month.  I’ve got a new CERT class starting this week and I’m traveling on business next week, all of which precludes fiddling with trade-ins and dealerships.  In the meantime, perhaps those with experience with any of the above-mentioned vehicles could comment. 

But note that buying used is not an option for me.  Seriously, I don’t play the used game.  For those that feel morally superior for buying used, step back for a second and think about where your used vehicles come from.  Someone had to buy them first.  I’m the one who supplies you with vehicles that have been well-maintained (I have all regularly scheduled maintenance done at the correct intervals) and that haven’t been dogged out all the time.  In this one instance I would feel a little bit bad about foisting off the Avalanche on the used market, but still, it’s low-mileage and hasn’t been abused, so perhaps it could find a good home with someone.